TigerData logo
TigerData logo
  • Product

    Product

    Tiger Cloud

    Robust elastic cloud platform for startups and enterprises

    TimescaleDB Enterprise

    Self-managed TimescaleDB for on-prem, edge and private cloud

    Open source

    TimescaleDB

    Time-series, real-time analytics and events on Postgres

    Search

    Vector and keyword search on Postgres

  • Industry

    Data Centers

    Energy & Utilities

    Oilfield Services

    Smart Manufacturing

    Crypto

  • Docs
  • Pricing
  • Developer Hub

    Changelog

    Benchmarks

    Blog

    Community

    Customer Stories

    Events

    Support

    Integrations

    Launch Hub

  • Company

    About

    TigerData logo

    Timescale

    Partners

    Security

    Careers

View on GitHub (opens in a new tab)

Contact usStart a free trial
Home
Tiger MCP vs. a Generic Postgres MCP Server
Time Series Forecasting with PostgreSQL: Methods, SQL Examples, and When to Use PythonTime-Series Analysis and Forecasting With Python Why Consider Using PostgreSQL for Time-Series Data?Time-Series Analysis in RWhat Is Temporal Data?Understanding Autoregressive Time-Series ModelingAlternatives to TimescaleStationary Time-Series AnalysisWhat Are Open-Source Time-Series Databases—Understanding Your OptionsIs Your Data Time Series? Data Types Supported by PostgreSQL and TimescaleUnderstanding Database Workloads: Variable, Bursty, and Uniform PatternsThe Best Time-Series Databases Compared (2026)Time Series Anomaly Detection: Methods, SQL, and Real-Time ImplementationAWS Timestream Alternatives: Your Migration Options After LiveAnalyticsTime-Series Database: What It Is, How It Works, and When You Need OneWhat Is a Time Series and How Is It Used?How to Work With Time Series in Python?Tools for Working With Time-Series Analysis in PythonGuide to Time-Series Analysis in PythonCreating a Fast Time-Series Graph With Postgres Materialized Views
OpenTelemetry Backend: Choosing Metrics Storage That Doesn't Lock You InGPU Cluster Monitoring: The Database Behind AI Infrastructure TelemetryWhat Is DCIM Software, and What Database Does It Use?Data Center Power Monitoring: The Database Layer Behind PUE, PDU, and Sustainability MetricsPrometheus Long-Term Storage: Thanos, Mimir, VictoriaMetrics, and PostgreSQL Compared
Understanding PostgreSQLUnderstanding SQL Aggregate FunctionsUnderstanding the rank() and dense_rank() Functions in PostgreSQLUnderstanding percentile_cont() and percentile_disc() in PostgreSQLStructured vs. Semi-Structured vs. Unstructured Data in PostgreSQLOptimizing Your Database: A Deep Dive into PostgreSQL Data TypesPostgres Cheat SheetHow to Address ‘Error: Could Not Resize Shared Memory Segment’ Understanding the Postgres extract() FunctionUnderstanding FROM in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Install PostgreSQL on LinuxHow to Install PostgreSQL on MacOSUnderstanding FILTER in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding HAVING in PostgreSQL (With Examples)5 Common Connection Errors in PostgreSQL and How to Solve ThemUnderstanding GROUP BY in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Fix No Partition of Relation Found for Row in Postgres DatabasesUnderstanding LIMIT in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Fix Transaction ID Wraparound ExhaustionUnderstanding ORDER BY in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding PostgreSQL FunctionsUnderstanding WINDOW in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding PostgreSQL WITHIN GROUPPostgreSQL Mathematical Functions: Enhancing Coding EfficiencyUnderstanding DISTINCT in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding WHERE in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding OFFSET in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding the Postgres string_agg FunctionUnderstanding PostgreSQL SELECTWhat Characters Are Allowed in PostgreSQL Strings?What Is Data Transformation, and Why Is It Important?What Is Data Compression and How Does It Work?Using PostgreSQL UPDATE With JOINUnderstanding PostgreSQL User-Defined FunctionsUnderstanding Foreign Keys in PostgreSQLData Processing With PostgreSQL Window FunctionsUnderstanding PostgreSQL Date and Time FunctionsWhat Is a PostgreSQL Full Outer Join?What Is a PostgreSQL Inner Join?What Is a PostgreSQL Left Join? And a Right Join?PostgreSQL Join Type TheoryA Guide to PostgreSQL ViewsStrategies for Improving Postgres JOIN PerformanceUnderstanding PostgreSQL's COALESCE FunctionUnderstanding PostgreSQL Array FunctionsUnderstanding PostgreSQL Conditional FunctionsUsing PostgreSQL String Functions for Improved Data AnalysisPostgreSQL vs. Cassandra: The Decision Framework for Time-Series and Write-Heavy WorkloadsPostgreSQL Joins : A SummaryWhat Is a PostgreSQL Cross Join?Data Partitioning: What It Is and Why It MattersSelf-Hosted or Cloud Database? A Countryside Reflection on Infrastructure ChoicesUnderstanding ACID Compliance
Connect Your AI Coding Agent to Tiger Cloud: Setup for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, and MoreHow to Monitor and Optimize PostgreSQL Index PerformanceGuide to PostgreSQL PerformancePostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Designing and Implementing Your Database SchemaPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Key ParametersPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Optimizing Database IndexesDetermining the Optimal Postgres Partition SizeWhen to Consider Postgres PartitioningAn Intro to Data Modeling on PostgreSQLDesigning Your Database Schema: Wide vs. Narrow Postgres TablesGuide to PostgreSQL Database OperationsBest Practices for Time-Series Data Modeling: Single or Multiple Partitioned Table(s) a.k.a. Hypertables Best Practices for (Time-)Series Metadata Tables A PostgreSQL Database Replication GuideA Guide to Data Analysis on PostgreSQLHow to Query JSONB in PostgreSQLHow to Compute Standard Deviation With PostgreSQLPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: How to Size Your DatabaseSQL/JSON Data Model and JSON in SQL: A PostgreSQL PerspectiveUnderstanding PostgreSQL TablespacesTop PostgreSQL Drivers for PythonPg_partman vs. Hypertables for Postgres PartitioningExplaining PostgreSQL EXPLAINGuide to PostgreSQL Database DesignHow PostgreSQL Data Aggregation WorksBuilding a Scalable DatabaseA Guide to pg_restore (and pg_restore Example)How to Index JSONB Columns in PostgreSQLWhat Is Audit Logging and How to Enable It in PostgreSQLOptimizing Array Queries With GIN Indexes in PostgreSQLHow to Reduce Bloat in Large PostgreSQL TablesGuide to PostgreSQL SecurityHow to Query JSON Metadata in PostgreSQLRecursive Query in SQL: What It Is, and How to Write OneNavigating Growing PostgreSQL Tables With Partitioning (and More)What Is a PostgreSQL Temporary View?How to Use PostgreSQL for Data TransformationHandling Large Objects in PostgresHow to Use Psycopg2: The PostgreSQL Adapter for PythonA Guide to Scaling PostgreSQLAWS Timestream for InfluxDB Alternative: When You Need to Look FurtherHow to Migrate from AWS Timestream to PostgreSQL: A Technical GuideHow to Choose a Database: A Decision Framework for Modern ApplicationsGuide to Postgres Data Management
Time-Series Database High Availability and Disaster RecoveryBest Practices for Scaling PostgreSQLHow to Store Video in PostgreSQL Using BYTEABest Practices for Postgres PerformanceHow to Design Your PostgreSQL Database: Two Schema ExamplesBest Practices for PostgreSQL Database OperationsHow to Manage Your Data With Data Retention PoliciesBest Practices for PostgreSQL Data AnalysisBest Practices for PostgreSQL AggregationBest Practices for Postgres Database ReplicationBest Practices for Postgres Data ManagementHow to Use a Common Table Expression (CTE) in SQLHow to Use PostgreSQL for Data NormalizationTesting Postgres Ingest: INSERT vs. Batch INSERT vs. COPYBest Practices for Postgres SecurityHow to Handle High-Cardinality Data in PostgreSQLPostgreSQL Compression: Every Option, When To Use Each, and What To Expect
The Best PostgreSQL Extensions for Analytics Workloads: A Field GuidePostgreSQL Extensions: amcheckPostgreSQL Extensions: Unlocking Multidimensional Points With Cube PostgreSQL Extensions: hstorePostgreSQL Extensions: ltreePostgreSQL Extensions: Secure Your Time-Series Data With pgcryptoPostgreSQL Extensions: pg_prewarmPostgreSQL Extensions: pgRoutingPostgreSQL Extensions: pg_stat_statementsPostgreSQL Extensions: Database Testing With pgTAPPostgreSQL Extensions: Install pg_trgm for Data MatchingPostgreSQL Extensions: PL/pgSQLPostgreSQL Extensions: Using PostGIS and Timescale for Advanced Geospatial InsightsPostgreSQL Extensions: Intro to uuid-osspTurning PostgreSQL Into a Vector Database With pgvector
What Is ClickHouse and How Does It Compare to PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB for Time Series?Timescale vs. Amazon RDS PostgreSQL: Up to 350x Faster Queries, 44 % Faster Ingest, 95 % Storage Savings for Time-Series DataWhat We Learned From Benchmarking Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL ServerlessTimescaleDB vs. Amazon Timestream: 6,000x Higher Inserts, 5-175x Faster Queries, 150-220x CheaperHow to Store Time-Series Data in MongoDB and Why That’s a Bad IdeaPostgreSQL + TimescaleDB: 1,000x Faster Queries, 90 % Data Compression, and Much MoreEye or the Tiger: Benchmarking Cassandra vs. TimescaleDB for Time-Series Data
MES Data Architecture: Modeling Work Orders, Genealogy, and Historian IntegrationMeter Data Management: Why AMI Interval Data Breaks Legacy MDM SystemsGeofencing and Driver Behavior Analytics: How to Store Both in One DatabaseWhich Database for a Digital Twin? Digital Twin Database Options ComparedGrid Modernization: Why the Data Layer Decides Whether It WorksFleet Telemetry Database: How to Store and Query Vehicle Sensor Data at ScaleUnderstanding IoT (Internet of Things)A Beginner’s Guide to IIoT and Industry 4.0DERMS Database: Solving the Single Source of DER Data ProblemForecasting the Physical World: Foundation Models for Predictive MaintenanceBuilding Energy Management System: The Data Layer Behind Energy Monitoring, Sub-Metering, and M&VSmart Building Analytics: Turning BMS Telemetry Into Occupancy, Energy, and HVAC InsightEV Charging Load ManagementBuilding Management System Database: Architecture for BACnet, Modbus, and Smart Building Sensor Data at ScaleSmart Grid Data Platform: Architecting for SCADA, AMI, PMU, and DERMS Data at ScaleDigital Twin Architecture: The Database and Data Model Behind a Digital TwinCAN Bus Data Logger: Decoding DBC and J1939 Signals into PostgresPredictive Maintenance Database Architecture: Storing and Querying Sensor Data for Failure PredictionPhysical AI Telemetry: Database Architecture for Autonomous-Vehicle FleetsPlant Historian: What It Captures and Where the Analytics Layer BeginsManufacturing Analytics Database: Architecture for Real-Time Production DataRobot Fleet Telemetry: Database Architecture for AMR, Industrial Robot, and Service Robot DataData Center Monitoring: What Database Stores Your Telemetry?EV Charging Management System: Architecture, OCPP Data, and the Right DatabaseIIoT Database Requirements: Six Things Your Database Must DoWater Utilities Database: How to Store and Query SCADA, AMI, and Quality Data at ScaleWhat Is an Edge Database? On-Device Storage, Sync Patterns, and Choosing the Right StackData Historian vs. Time-Series Database: How to Choose and When to SwitchWhat Is a Data Historian?The Best Databases for IoT in 2026: A Practical ComparisonHow Hopthru Powers Real-Time Transit Analytics From a 1 TB TableStoring IoT Data: 8 Reasons Why You Should Use PostgreSQLHow to Simulate a Basic IoT Sensor Dataset on PostgreSQLFrom Ingest to Insights in Milliseconds: Everactive's Tech Transformation With TimescaleHow Ndustrial Is Providing Fast Real-Time Queries and Safely Storing Client Data With 97 % CompressionWhy You Should Use PostgreSQL for Industrial IoT Data Migrating a Low-Code IoT Platform Storing 20M Records/DayHow United Manufacturing Hub Is Introducing Open Source to ManufacturingBuilding IoT Pipelines for Faster Analytics With IoT CoreVisualizing IoT Data at Scale With Hopara and TimescaleDB
A Brief History of AI: How Did We Get Here, and What's Next?A Beginner’s Guide to Vector EmbeddingsPostgreSQL as a Vector Database: A Pgvector TutorialUsing Pgvector With PythonHow to Choose a Vector DatabaseVector Databases Are the Wrong AbstractionUnderstanding DiskANNA Guide to Cosine SimilarityStreaming DiskANN: How We Made PostgreSQL as Fast as Pinecone for Vector DataImplementing Cosine Similarity in PythonVector Database Basics: HNSWVector Database Options for AWSVector Store vs. Vector Database: Understanding the ConnectionPgvector vs. Pinecone: Vector Database Performance and Cost ComparisonHow to Build LLM Applications With Pgvector Vector Store in LangChainHow to Implement RAG With Amazon Bedrock and LangChainRAG Is More Than Just Vector SearchRefining Vector Search Queries With Time Filters in Pgvector: A TutorialUnderstanding Semantic SearchWhat Is Vector Search? Text-to-SQL: A Developer’s Zero-to-Hero GuideWhen Should You Use Full-Text Search vs. Vector Search?HNSW vs. DiskANNVector Search vs Semantic SearchBuilding AI Agents with Persistent Memory: A Unified Database ApproachNearest Neighbor Indexes: What Are IVFFlat Indexes in Pgvector and How Do They WorkPostgreSQL Hybrid Search Using Pgvector and CohereBuilding an AI Image Gallery With OpenAI CLIP, Claude Sonnet 3.5, and Pgvector
PostgreSQL OLTP: Transactions, Scale, and the Architecture That Makes It WorkHow to Choose an OLAP Database: A Practical Decision Guide (2026)Data Analytics vs. Real-Time Analytics: How to Pick Your Database (and Why It Should Be PostgreSQL)How to Choose a Real-Time Analytics DatabaseColumnar Databases vs. Row-Oriented Databases: Which to Choose?What Is the Best Database for Real-Time AnalyticsPostgreSQL as a Real-Time Analytics DatabaseUnderstanding OLAP: What It Is, How It Differs From OLTP, and Running It on PostgreSQLHow to Build an IoT Pipeline for Real-Time Analytics in PostgreSQL
Alternatives to RDSWhy Is RDS so Expensive? Understanding RDS Pricing and CostsEstimating RDS CostsHow to Migrate From AWS RDS for PostgreSQL to TimescaleAmazon Aurora vs. RDS: Understanding the Difference
5 InfluxDB Alternatives for Your Time-Series Data8 Reasons to Choose Timescale as Your InfluxDB Alternative InfluxQL, Flux, and SQL: Which Query Language Is Best? (With Cheatsheet)What InfluxDB Got WrongTimescaleDB vs. InfluxDB: Purpose Built Differently for Time-Series Data
5 Ways to Monitor Your PostgreSQL DatabaseHow to Migrate Your Data to Timescale (3 Ways)Postgres TOAST vs. Timescale CompressionBuilding Python Apps With PostgreSQL: A Developer's GuideData Visualization in PostgreSQL With Apache SupersetMore Time-Series Data Analysis, Fewer Lines of Code: Meet HyperfunctionsIs Postgres Partitioning Really That Hard? An Introduction To HypertablesPostgreSQL Materialized Views and Where to Find ThemTime-Series Downsampling: The Complete Guide to Tiered Data Resolution in SQLContinuous Aggregates: Incremental Materialized Views for Time-Series DataComplete Guide: Migrating from MongoDB to Tiger Data (Step-by-Step)Timescale Tips: Testing Your Chunk Size
Postgres cheat sheet
HomeAlternativesTime-series basicsData Center & Infrastructure TelemetryPostgres basicsPostgres guidesPostgres best practices
Home
Tiger MCP vs. a Generic Postgres MCP Server
Time Series Forecasting with PostgreSQL: Methods, SQL Examples, and When to Use PythonTime-Series Analysis and Forecasting With Python Why Consider Using PostgreSQL for Time-Series Data?Time-Series Analysis in RWhat Is Temporal Data?Understanding Autoregressive Time-Series ModelingAlternatives to TimescaleStationary Time-Series AnalysisWhat Are Open-Source Time-Series Databases—Understanding Your OptionsIs Your Data Time Series? Data Types Supported by PostgreSQL and TimescaleUnderstanding Database Workloads: Variable, Bursty, and Uniform PatternsThe Best Time-Series Databases Compared (2026)Time Series Anomaly Detection: Methods, SQL, and Real-Time ImplementationAWS Timestream Alternatives: Your Migration Options After LiveAnalyticsTime-Series Database: What It Is, How It Works, and When You Need OneWhat Is a Time Series and How Is It Used?How to Work With Time Series in Python?Tools for Working With Time-Series Analysis in PythonGuide to Time-Series Analysis in PythonCreating a Fast Time-Series Graph With Postgres Materialized Views
OpenTelemetry Backend: Choosing Metrics Storage That Doesn't Lock You InGPU Cluster Monitoring: The Database Behind AI Infrastructure TelemetryWhat Is DCIM Software, and What Database Does It Use?Data Center Power Monitoring: The Database Layer Behind PUE, PDU, and Sustainability MetricsPrometheus Long-Term Storage: Thanos, Mimir, VictoriaMetrics, and PostgreSQL Compared
Understanding PostgreSQLUnderstanding SQL Aggregate FunctionsUnderstanding the rank() and dense_rank() Functions in PostgreSQLUnderstanding percentile_cont() and percentile_disc() in PostgreSQLStructured vs. Semi-Structured vs. Unstructured Data in PostgreSQLOptimizing Your Database: A Deep Dive into PostgreSQL Data TypesPostgres Cheat SheetHow to Address ‘Error: Could Not Resize Shared Memory Segment’ Understanding the Postgres extract() FunctionUnderstanding FROM in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Install PostgreSQL on LinuxHow to Install PostgreSQL on MacOSUnderstanding FILTER in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding HAVING in PostgreSQL (With Examples)5 Common Connection Errors in PostgreSQL and How to Solve ThemUnderstanding GROUP BY in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Fix No Partition of Relation Found for Row in Postgres DatabasesUnderstanding LIMIT in PostgreSQL (With Examples)How to Fix Transaction ID Wraparound ExhaustionUnderstanding ORDER BY in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding PostgreSQL FunctionsUnderstanding WINDOW in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding PostgreSQL WITHIN GROUPPostgreSQL Mathematical Functions: Enhancing Coding EfficiencyUnderstanding DISTINCT in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding WHERE in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding OFFSET in PostgreSQL (With Examples)Understanding the Postgres string_agg FunctionUnderstanding PostgreSQL SELECTWhat Characters Are Allowed in PostgreSQL Strings?What Is Data Transformation, and Why Is It Important?What Is Data Compression and How Does It Work?Using PostgreSQL UPDATE With JOINUnderstanding PostgreSQL User-Defined FunctionsUnderstanding Foreign Keys in PostgreSQLData Processing With PostgreSQL Window FunctionsUnderstanding PostgreSQL Date and Time FunctionsWhat Is a PostgreSQL Full Outer Join?What Is a PostgreSQL Inner Join?What Is a PostgreSQL Left Join? And a Right Join?PostgreSQL Join Type TheoryA Guide to PostgreSQL ViewsStrategies for Improving Postgres JOIN PerformanceUnderstanding PostgreSQL's COALESCE FunctionUnderstanding PostgreSQL Array FunctionsUnderstanding PostgreSQL Conditional FunctionsUsing PostgreSQL String Functions for Improved Data AnalysisPostgreSQL vs. Cassandra: The Decision Framework for Time-Series and Write-Heavy WorkloadsPostgreSQL Joins : A SummaryWhat Is a PostgreSQL Cross Join?Data Partitioning: What It Is and Why It MattersSelf-Hosted or Cloud Database? A Countryside Reflection on Infrastructure ChoicesUnderstanding ACID Compliance
Connect Your AI Coding Agent to Tiger Cloud: Setup for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, and MoreHow to Monitor and Optimize PostgreSQL Index PerformanceGuide to PostgreSQL PerformancePostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Designing and Implementing Your Database SchemaPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Key ParametersPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: Optimizing Database IndexesDetermining the Optimal Postgres Partition SizeWhen to Consider Postgres PartitioningAn Intro to Data Modeling on PostgreSQLDesigning Your Database Schema: Wide vs. Narrow Postgres TablesGuide to PostgreSQL Database OperationsBest Practices for Time-Series Data Modeling: Single or Multiple Partitioned Table(s) a.k.a. Hypertables Best Practices for (Time-)Series Metadata Tables A PostgreSQL Database Replication GuideA Guide to Data Analysis on PostgreSQLHow to Query JSONB in PostgreSQLHow to Compute Standard Deviation With PostgreSQLPostgreSQL Performance Tuning: How to Size Your DatabaseSQL/JSON Data Model and JSON in SQL: A PostgreSQL PerspectiveUnderstanding PostgreSQL TablespacesTop PostgreSQL Drivers for PythonPg_partman vs. Hypertables for Postgres PartitioningExplaining PostgreSQL EXPLAINGuide to PostgreSQL Database DesignHow PostgreSQL Data Aggregation WorksBuilding a Scalable DatabaseA Guide to pg_restore (and pg_restore Example)How to Index JSONB Columns in PostgreSQLWhat Is Audit Logging and How to Enable It in PostgreSQLOptimizing Array Queries With GIN Indexes in PostgreSQLHow to Reduce Bloat in Large PostgreSQL TablesGuide to PostgreSQL SecurityHow to Query JSON Metadata in PostgreSQLRecursive Query in SQL: What It Is, and How to Write OneNavigating Growing PostgreSQL Tables With Partitioning (and More)What Is a PostgreSQL Temporary View?How to Use PostgreSQL for Data TransformationHandling Large Objects in PostgresHow to Use Psycopg2: The PostgreSQL Adapter for PythonA Guide to Scaling PostgreSQLAWS Timestream for InfluxDB Alternative: When You Need to Look FurtherHow to Migrate from AWS Timestream to PostgreSQL: A Technical GuideHow to Choose a Database: A Decision Framework for Modern ApplicationsGuide to Postgres Data Management
Time-Series Database High Availability and Disaster RecoveryBest Practices for Scaling PostgreSQLHow to Store Video in PostgreSQL Using BYTEABest Practices for Postgres PerformanceHow to Design Your PostgreSQL Database: Two Schema ExamplesBest Practices for PostgreSQL Database OperationsHow to Manage Your Data With Data Retention PoliciesBest Practices for PostgreSQL Data AnalysisBest Practices for PostgreSQL AggregationBest Practices for Postgres Database ReplicationBest Practices for Postgres Data ManagementHow to Use a Common Table Expression (CTE) in SQLHow to Use PostgreSQL for Data NormalizationTesting Postgres Ingest: INSERT vs. Batch INSERT vs. COPYBest Practices for Postgres SecurityHow to Handle High-Cardinality Data in PostgreSQLPostgreSQL Compression: Every Option, When To Use Each, and What To Expect
The Best PostgreSQL Extensions for Analytics Workloads: A Field GuidePostgreSQL Extensions: amcheckPostgreSQL Extensions: Unlocking Multidimensional Points With Cube PostgreSQL Extensions: hstorePostgreSQL Extensions: ltreePostgreSQL Extensions: Secure Your Time-Series Data With pgcryptoPostgreSQL Extensions: pg_prewarmPostgreSQL Extensions: pgRoutingPostgreSQL Extensions: pg_stat_statementsPostgreSQL Extensions: Database Testing With pgTAPPostgreSQL Extensions: Install pg_trgm for Data MatchingPostgreSQL Extensions: PL/pgSQLPostgreSQL Extensions: Using PostGIS and Timescale for Advanced Geospatial InsightsPostgreSQL Extensions: Intro to uuid-osspTurning PostgreSQL Into a Vector Database With pgvector
What Is ClickHouse and How Does It Compare to PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB for Time Series?Timescale vs. Amazon RDS PostgreSQL: Up to 350x Faster Queries, 44 % Faster Ingest, 95 % Storage Savings for Time-Series DataWhat We Learned From Benchmarking Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL ServerlessTimescaleDB vs. Amazon Timestream: 6,000x Higher Inserts, 5-175x Faster Queries, 150-220x CheaperHow to Store Time-Series Data in MongoDB and Why That’s a Bad IdeaPostgreSQL + TimescaleDB: 1,000x Faster Queries, 90 % Data Compression, and Much MoreEye or the Tiger: Benchmarking Cassandra vs. TimescaleDB for Time-Series Data
MES Data Architecture: Modeling Work Orders, Genealogy, and Historian IntegrationMeter Data Management: Why AMI Interval Data Breaks Legacy MDM SystemsGeofencing and Driver Behavior Analytics: How to Store Both in One DatabaseWhich Database for a Digital Twin? Digital Twin Database Options ComparedGrid Modernization: Why the Data Layer Decides Whether It WorksFleet Telemetry Database: How to Store and Query Vehicle Sensor Data at ScaleUnderstanding IoT (Internet of Things)A Beginner’s Guide to IIoT and Industry 4.0DERMS Database: Solving the Single Source of DER Data ProblemForecasting the Physical World: Foundation Models for Predictive MaintenanceBuilding Energy Management System: The Data Layer Behind Energy Monitoring, Sub-Metering, and M&VSmart Building Analytics: Turning BMS Telemetry Into Occupancy, Energy, and HVAC InsightEV Charging Load ManagementBuilding Management System Database: Architecture for BACnet, Modbus, and Smart Building Sensor Data at ScaleSmart Grid Data Platform: Architecting for SCADA, AMI, PMU, and DERMS Data at ScaleDigital Twin Architecture: The Database and Data Model Behind a Digital TwinCAN Bus Data Logger: Decoding DBC and J1939 Signals into PostgresPredictive Maintenance Database Architecture: Storing and Querying Sensor Data for Failure PredictionPhysical AI Telemetry: Database Architecture for Autonomous-Vehicle FleetsPlant Historian: What It Captures and Where the Analytics Layer BeginsManufacturing Analytics Database: Architecture for Real-Time Production DataRobot Fleet Telemetry: Database Architecture for AMR, Industrial Robot, and Service Robot DataData Center Monitoring: What Database Stores Your Telemetry?EV Charging Management System: Architecture, OCPP Data, and the Right DatabaseIIoT Database Requirements: Six Things Your Database Must DoWater Utilities Database: How to Store and Query SCADA, AMI, and Quality Data at ScaleWhat Is an Edge Database? On-Device Storage, Sync Patterns, and Choosing the Right StackData Historian vs. Time-Series Database: How to Choose and When to SwitchWhat Is a Data Historian?The Best Databases for IoT in 2026: A Practical ComparisonHow Hopthru Powers Real-Time Transit Analytics From a 1 TB TableStoring IoT Data: 8 Reasons Why You Should Use PostgreSQLHow to Simulate a Basic IoT Sensor Dataset on PostgreSQLFrom Ingest to Insights in Milliseconds: Everactive's Tech Transformation With TimescaleHow Ndustrial Is Providing Fast Real-Time Queries and Safely Storing Client Data With 97 % CompressionWhy You Should Use PostgreSQL for Industrial IoT Data Migrating a Low-Code IoT Platform Storing 20M Records/DayHow United Manufacturing Hub Is Introducing Open Source to ManufacturingBuilding IoT Pipelines for Faster Analytics With IoT CoreVisualizing IoT Data at Scale With Hopara and TimescaleDB
A Brief History of AI: How Did We Get Here, and What's Next?A Beginner’s Guide to Vector EmbeddingsPostgreSQL as a Vector Database: A Pgvector TutorialUsing Pgvector With PythonHow to Choose a Vector DatabaseVector Databases Are the Wrong AbstractionUnderstanding DiskANNA Guide to Cosine SimilarityStreaming DiskANN: How We Made PostgreSQL as Fast as Pinecone for Vector DataImplementing Cosine Similarity in PythonVector Database Basics: HNSWVector Database Options for AWSVector Store vs. Vector Database: Understanding the ConnectionPgvector vs. Pinecone: Vector Database Performance and Cost ComparisonHow to Build LLM Applications With Pgvector Vector Store in LangChainHow to Implement RAG With Amazon Bedrock and LangChainRAG Is More Than Just Vector SearchRefining Vector Search Queries With Time Filters in Pgvector: A TutorialUnderstanding Semantic SearchWhat Is Vector Search? Text-to-SQL: A Developer’s Zero-to-Hero GuideWhen Should You Use Full-Text Search vs. Vector Search?HNSW vs. DiskANNVector Search vs Semantic SearchBuilding AI Agents with Persistent Memory: A Unified Database ApproachNearest Neighbor Indexes: What Are IVFFlat Indexes in Pgvector and How Do They WorkPostgreSQL Hybrid Search Using Pgvector and CohereBuilding an AI Image Gallery With OpenAI CLIP, Claude Sonnet 3.5, and Pgvector
PostgreSQL OLTP: Transactions, Scale, and the Architecture That Makes It WorkHow to Choose an OLAP Database: A Practical Decision Guide (2026)Data Analytics vs. Real-Time Analytics: How to Pick Your Database (and Why It Should Be PostgreSQL)How to Choose a Real-Time Analytics DatabaseColumnar Databases vs. Row-Oriented Databases: Which to Choose?What Is the Best Database for Real-Time AnalyticsPostgreSQL as a Real-Time Analytics DatabaseUnderstanding OLAP: What It Is, How It Differs From OLTP, and Running It on PostgreSQLHow to Build an IoT Pipeline for Real-Time Analytics in PostgreSQL
Alternatives to RDSWhy Is RDS so Expensive? Understanding RDS Pricing and CostsEstimating RDS CostsHow to Migrate From AWS RDS for PostgreSQL to TimescaleAmazon Aurora vs. RDS: Understanding the Difference
5 InfluxDB Alternatives for Your Time-Series Data8 Reasons to Choose Timescale as Your InfluxDB Alternative InfluxQL, Flux, and SQL: Which Query Language Is Best? (With Cheatsheet)What InfluxDB Got WrongTimescaleDB vs. InfluxDB: Purpose Built Differently for Time-Series Data
5 Ways to Monitor Your PostgreSQL DatabaseHow to Migrate Your Data to Timescale (3 Ways)Postgres TOAST vs. Timescale CompressionBuilding Python Apps With PostgreSQL: A Developer's GuideData Visualization in PostgreSQL With Apache SupersetMore Time-Series Data Analysis, Fewer Lines of Code: Meet HyperfunctionsIs Postgres Partitioning Really That Hard? An Introduction To HypertablesPostgreSQL Materialized Views and Where to Find ThemTime-Series Downsampling: The Complete Guide to Tiered Data Resolution in SQLContinuous Aggregates: Incremental Materialized Views for Time-Series DataComplete Guide: Migrating from MongoDB to Tiger Data (Step-by-Step)Timescale Tips: Testing Your Chunk Size
Postgres cheat sheet
Tiger Data

Products

  • TimescaleDB
  • Tiger Cloud
  • TimescaleDB Enterprise
  • Postgres Search Stack

Industry

  • Data Centers
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Oilfield Services
  • Smart Manufacturing
  • Crypto

Support

  • Cloud Status
  • Support
  • Security
  • Terms of Service
  • Code Of Conduct

Learn

  • Documentation
  • Blog
  • Tutorials
  • Changelog
  • Success Stories

Company

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Newsroom
  • Brand
  • Events

Products

  • TimescaleDB
  • Tiger Cloud
  • TimescaleDB Enterprise
  • Postgres Search Stack

Industry

  • Data Centers
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Oilfield Services
  • Smart Manufacturing
  • Crypto

Support

  • Cloud Status
  • Support
  • Security
  • Terms of Service
  • Code Of Conduct

Learn

  • Documentation
  • Blog
  • Tutorials
  • Changelog
  • Success Stories

Company

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Newsroom
  • Brand
  • Events
Privacy preferencesLegalPrivacySitemap

Subscribe to the Tiger Data newsletter

Strategic Partner with Inductive Automation — Ignition

2026 (c) Timescale, Inc., d/b/a Tiger Data.
All rights reserved.

Tiger Data

2026 (c) Timescale, Inc., d/b/a Tiger Data.
All rights reserved.

Privacy preferencesLegalPrivacySitemap

By Tiger Data Team

Updated at Oct 7, 2026

Table of contents

    How to Choose an OLAP Database: A Practical Decision Guide (2026)

    How to Choose an OLAP Database

    By Tiger Data Team

    Updated at Oct 7, 2026

    Originally published on Nov. 28, 2024

    The market for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) databases in 2026 splits into five architecture categories. Each has its own performance profile, operational model, and cost structure. If you choose the wrong category, the cost shows up slowly. 

    You spend the next two years fighting architectural debt, duplicate pipelines, and stale dashboards. Your team also carries the on-call burden of systems that never quite stay in sync.

    Tiger Data publishes this guide, and we build a PostgreSQL-based analytics database. You should know that upfront. We have a perspective, and you'll see it in the profiles below. We still wrote this guide to be useful whatever you choose. Sometimes a dedicated OLAP engine is clearly the better fit. If ClickHouse, Snowflake, or DuckDB is right for your workload, we'd rather you find that out here than after a costly migration.

    Quick navigation. Jump to the architecture categories, the database profiles, the decision framework, or the POC checklist.

    Here is what the guide covers: five architecture categories and seven database profiles (ClickHouse, Apache Druid, Apache Pinot, StarRocks, DuckDB/MotherDuck, Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift, and PostgreSQL with Tiger Data). It also includes a structured decision framework and a proof-of-concept (POC) checklist you can apply to your actual query patterns.

    What makes an OLAP database different

    An OLAP database is a system optimized for wide aggregations across large datasets, scanning millions or billions of rows, reading only a few columns, and returning aggregated results fast. 

    Row-oriented storage forces the engine to read every column in every row even when the query needs only one, wasting I/O and slowing aggregation at scale. That mismatch is why dedicated OLAP databases exist.

    Row-oriented storage is optimized for writing a row, reading a row, and updating a row. That works well for transactional systems where queries touch a handful of records. Analytical queries work differently, and the storage model that serves transactions well actively harms analytical performance.

    OLAP vs. OLTP

    OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) systems, such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server, are built for high-throughput writes and narrow point lookups. Think of inserting one order, fetching one user record, or updating one inventory count. 

    OLAP systems are built for wide aggregations across large datasets. A typical query computes the 30-day rolling average revenue by product across every region, with filters across a star schema.

    Schema design follows the same split. Transactional systems use normalized schemas. These reduce redundant data and enforce referential integrity. OLAP systems often use star schemas, which keep JOINs to a minimum at query time. 

    Snowflake schemas normalize the dimension tables further. They save storage but add JOINs. Many modern engines, ClickHouse among them, also favor wide, denormalized tables.

    In 2026, the line between the two is blurring. HTAP (Hybrid Transactional/Analytical Processing) architectures can now deliver sub-second analytical queries on fresh transactional data for many workloads, often with no separate ETL pipeline. PostgreSQL-native approaches like Tiger Data fall in this group. The old split of OLTP for writes and OLAP for reads no longer covers the full picture.

    For a deeper look at OLAP vs. OLTP architecture, see What OLAP is, how it differs from OLTP, and how to run it on PostgreSQL.

    Why columnar storage is foundational to OLAP performance

    Columnar storage reorganizes data on disk. It stores all values for a given column together, instead of all values for a given row. Take the query SELECT SUM(revenue) FROM orders WHERE region = 'EMEA'. A columnar engine reads only the revenue and region columns and skips every other column in the table. On a table with 50 columns and 10 billion rows, that can cut the data read by an order of magnitude.

    Compression also improves in columnar storage. Values within a single column share the same data type and are often similar or correlated. Several techniques take advantage of this:

    • Dictionary encoding maps repeated strings, like country codes or product categories, to small integer identifiers.

    • Run-length encoding collapses a sequence of identical values into a single value-and-count pair.

    • Delta encoding stores the difference between consecutive timestamps instead of the full value. This shrinks time-series sensor data significantly.

    Columnar layout keeps similar values side by side, so these techniques work well. Row-oriented layout scatters those values across rows, so they gain much less.

    For a direct comparison of columnar and row-oriented storage architectures, see Columnar databases vs. row-oriented databases and which to choose.

    MOLAP, ROLAP, and HOLAP

    These three terms show up in vendor documentation and enterprise RFPs (requests for proposal). They describe the storage and processing model of an OLAP system.

    • MOLAP (Multidimensional OLAP) pre-aggregates data into multidimensional cubes before any query runs. Responses are fast for known patterns because the answer is already computed. The trade-off is inflexibility. Ad-hoc queries on dimensions nobody anticipated at cube design time perform poorly or fail outright. In 2026, MOLAP is a legacy architecture for most new projects. It is tied to tools like Microsoft SSAS Multidimensional. The term still appears in RFPs from teams who learned OLAP a decade ago.

    • ROLAP (Relational OLAP) runs queries against relational or columnar storage at query time and needs no pre-aggregation. This model is flexible, scales to petabyte-class datasets, and supports ad-hoc queries. ClickHouse, StarRocks, Snowflake, BigQuery, and Amazon Redshift all fit here. Apache Druid and Apache Pinot are often listed in this group too, though both can pre-aggregate data at ingestion.

    • HOLAP (Hybrid OLAP) combines pre-aggregation for known query patterns with live querying for ad-hoc ones. Tiger Data's continuous aggregates implement HOLAP behavior on PostgreSQL through incremental materialized views that refresh on a schedule, with real-time aggregation available to include the newest rows at query time. Known query patterns get pre-computed results. The underlying hypertable stays open for ad-hoc analysis, and you have no separate ETL pipeline to maintain.

    Most modern databases marketed as "OLAP" are ROLAP. MOLAP is legacy. HOLAP is the emerging model in PostgreSQL-native analytics.

    Modern OLAP architecture in five categories (2026)

    The OLAP market in 2026 splits into five categories. Knowing which category a database belongs to is the most important step in selection. Each one makes different assumptions about ingest latency, query patterns, SQL completeness, and operational overhead. The profiles later in this guide follow the same taxonomy.

    Cloud data warehouses

    Representatives include Snowflake, Google BigQuery, and Amazon Redshift.

    These systems separate compute from storage and bill for each independently. Ingest typically runs in minutes to hours through batch ETL pipelines (Fivetran, dbt, Snowpipe). Queries target BI workloads: dashboards and reports that scan terabytes to petabytes of history and return in seconds to minutes. Tableau, Looker, and Power BI integrate natively with all three. Operations stay light because there are no clusters to manage.

    The trade-off is data freshness. Streaming ingest options exist (Snowpipe Streaming, BigQuery Storage Write API). They can bring latency down to seconds, but they add cost and complexity. Freshness under 60 seconds sits outside the core design target.

    Real-time OLAP engines

    Representatives include ClickHouse, StarRocks, Apache Druid, and Apache Pinot.

    These engines are built for sub-second queries on data that is seconds to minutes old. They are columnar from the ground up. They handle high-throughput ingest (ClickHouse can ingest millions of rows per second on a single node) and many concurrent dashboard users. They power the live metrics you see on Cloudflare's Radar, Uber's trip dashboards, and LinkedIn's ad performance screens.

    The trade-off is SQL completeness. Druid has no row-level UPDATE or DELETE. ClickHouse supports JOINs, but you need deliberate schema design to make them fast. These engines also demand dedicated operational effort, whether self-hosted or on a managed offering like ClickHouse Cloud.

    Embedded and local-first OLAP

    Representatives include DuckDB and MotherDuck.

    DuckDB runs as an in-process library. It needs no server, no cluster, and no operational work. It embeds in Python, R, Java, Go, and Node.js, or runs as a CLI. MotherDuck is its managed cloud companion. DuckDB reads Parquet, CSV, JSON, Delta Lake, and Apache Iceberg files directly from disk or object storage. This makes it a popular query layer for data science notebooks and serverless analytics pipelines.

    Think of DuckDB as SQLite for analytics: zero infrastructure, full SQL, and fast single-user queries. The limitation is concurrency. DuckDB runs in a single process, so it is not designed to serve 500 simultaneous dashboard users.

    Extended relational databases (PostgreSQL-native OLAP)

    Representatives include Tiger Data (via the TimescaleDB extension) and pg_duckdb.

    These systems layer columnar storage and analytical capabilities onto standard PostgreSQL. There is no separate system to operate. Analytics and transactions share the same database, the same connection pool, and the same SQL dialect. Tiger Data adds Hypercore (a hybrid row-columnar storage engine), hypertables (time-partitioned tables), and continuous aggregates (incrementally refreshed materialized views) on top of PostgreSQL. pg_duckdb is an alternative approach. It embeds DuckDB's columnar execution engine directly inside PostgreSQL, with a different set of trade-offs.

    The trade-off is a scale ceiling. PostgreSQL-native approaches are competitive for terabyte-class workloads with mixed transactional and analytical access patterns. Multi-petabyte, purely analytical workloads with no transactional component are better served by cloud data warehouses.

    Lakehouse query engines

    Representatives include Trino, Presto, Databricks SQL, and Apache Spark SQL.

    These are federated query layers over open table formats such as Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake, and Apache Hudi. Data lives in object storage (S3, GCS, Azure Blob). The query engine is a separate compute layer that reads those formats directly. Open formats maximize interoperability and limit vendor lock-in, since any compatible engine can read the data.

    The trade-off is operational complexity. Running Trino at production quality takes dedicated engineering effort: coordinator and worker management, query memory tuning, catalog configuration, and failure handling. This option suits large organizations that already invest in data lakes and have teams able to run distributed compute.

    Architecture comparison

    Category

    Representative DBs

    Ingest latency

    Query latency

    SQL completeness

    UPDATE/DELETE

    Operational overhead

    Optimal scale

    Cloud data warehouse

    Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift

    Minutes to hours (seconds with streaming)

    Seconds to minutes

    High

    Yes

    Low (managed)

    Petabyte

    Real-time OLAP engine

    ClickHouse, StarRocks, Druid, Pinot

    Seconds to minutes

    Sub-second

    Moderate

    Limited (varies by engine)

    Medium to high

    Terabyte to petabyte

    Embedded / local-first

    DuckDB, MotherDuck

    N/A (file-based)

    Sub-second (local)

    High

    Yes

    Near-zero

    GB to terabyte

    Extended relational

    Tiger Data, pg_duckdb

    Real-time

    Sub-second to seconds

    Full PostgreSQL

    Yes

    Low (managed)

    Terabyte

    Lakehouse query engine

    Trino, Databricks SQL

    N/A (query layer)

    Seconds

    High

    Via table format

    High

    Petabyte+

    What changed in OLAP in 2025 and what it means for your decision in 2026

    If you last evaluated OLAP options in 2023 or early 2024, several things have shifted since then. Here is what changed and what it means for your next selection.

    • DuckDB became the leading embedded OLAP engine. DuckDB 1.0 shipped in June 2024, and adoption grew quickly through 2025. It is now a common first choice for local analytics, data science notebooks, and serverless query layers over Parquet or Iceberg files. If your use case is local-first or embedded, evaluate DuckDB before anything else.

    • StarRocks gained ground on Apache Druid for JOIN-heavy real-time workloads. StarRocks supports CDC-style updates (UPDATE and DELETE on columnar data through Primary Key tables). Its JOIN performance is also stronger. This makes it a popular pick when you need to enrich event streams with JOINs. Druid remains strong for pure event-stream analytics at large scale. In new evaluations where JOINs matter, StarRocks now comes up more often.

    • Apache Iceberg emerged as the leading open table format. Most major OLAP engines can now read Iceberg tables, including ClickHouse, StarRocks, Druid, Snowflake, BigQuery, and DuckDB. If you are building or re-platforming a data architecture today, consider designing around Iceberg. It reduces future lock-in and simplifies cross-engine interoperability. You can switch query engines without migrating the underlying data.

    • HTAP maturity has raised the bar for "just add an OLAP engine." PostgreSQL-native analytical capabilities can now deliver sub-second queries on fresh transactional data for many workloads, often without a separate ETL pipeline. The old pattern puts OLTP on the write side, OLAP on the read side, and Kafka in the middle. That pattern carries real engineering cost: pipeline failures, backfill complexity, on-call burden, and constant drift between what your transactional database knows and what your analytics database shows. Evaluate zero-ETL options before you commit to a dual-system architecture.

    • ClickHouse made vector similarity search generally available in v25.8. ClickHouse now competes with pgvector for vector similarity search at scale. Teams that combine analytical queries with embedding-based search can use it as a unified option, which may remove the need for a separate vector database.

    • AWS closed Timestream for LiveAnalytics to new customers in June 2025. Existing customers can keep using it. If you are evaluating AWS time-series options today, the remaining product is Amazon Timestream for InfluxDB.

    How to evaluate an OLAP database using five decision criteria

    Before you compare specific databases, set your requirements against these five criteria. They point to the architecture category that fits your workload. The profiles and decision framework come after.

    Query latency and concurrency requirements

    This criterion most often decides the architecture category. Ask how fast queries need to be, and at what concurrency level.

    Sub-100ms p99 latency at 100 or more concurrent users starts to favor a purpose-built OLAP engine. ClickHouse handles this well for scan-heavy, append-only workloads. Apache Pinot targets the highest end of this range, with thousands of simultaneous users. Its star-tree indexes keep latency low even under very high concurrency. Sub-second latency at moderate concurrency (10 to 50 users) is achievable with extended relational databases (Tiger Data) or smaller OLAP engines. Cloud data warehouses fit best for batch workloads with latency in the seconds-to-minutes range.

    Benchmark p99 (the latency that 99% of queries beat), not p50. Median latency looks fine on almost every database. The slowest 1% of queries shows how a system behaves under load and at scale. Your users feel that behavior at peak concurrency.

    Ingest model and data freshness needs

    Separate three ingest patterns:

    • Real-time streaming ingest delivers data within seconds to minutes. ClickHouse, Druid, Pinot, StarRocks, and Tiger Data support it.

    • Micro-batch ingest runs in 5 to 15 minute windows.

    • Batch ETL loads data hourly or daily. Cloud data warehouses are optimized for this model.

    The key question is how stale data can get before it stops being actionable. If the answer is "under 60 seconds," cloud data warehouses are a poor fit, however attractive their managed model looks. A Snowflake dashboard showing data from 90 minutes ago has little value for a real-time operations team.

    SQL compatibility, JOINs, and upserts

    Gaps in SQL support are a common selection mistake. They often surface only after the POC, when the team finds that the database cannot run the queries the application needs.

    Apache Druid has no row-level UPDATE or DELETE, and its JOIN support is limited. It works best with denormalized schemas, where all the data a query needs is joined at ingest time. ClickHouse supports JOINs but performs best when the schema is designed around them, with small dimension tables broadcast against large fact tables. JOINs across normalized schemas with large tables need careful tuning. StarRocks treats JOINs as a core design goal and handles CDC-style upserts through Primary Key tables. Snowflake, BigQuery, and Redshift support full SQL, including UPDATE and DELETE. Frequent row-level updates get expensive at scale, though. Tiger Data delivers full PostgreSQL SQL, so every driver, ORM, and tool that works with PostgreSQL works without modification.

    If your workload needs JOINs at query time and row-level UPDATE/DELETE, verify both explicitly before you benchmark.

    Compression, storage economics, and TCO

    Columnar compression ratios vary widely with data type and value cardinality. Time-series sensor data (sequential timestamps, low-cardinality numeric values) compresses well. In documented benchmarks, Tiger Data's hypercore columnstore achieves up to 98% compression. A 1TB raw dataset can then fit in roughly 50GB or less. ClickHouse also compresses append-only event data well, using LZ4 and ZSTD codecs. In cloud data warehouses like Snowflake and BigQuery, the vendor manages compression transparently, so you cannot tune it directly.

    TCO (total cost of ownership) goes beyond storage. Cloud data warehouses charge separately for compute and storage. Compute costs can climb sharply with high query concurrency or ad-hoc exploration. Real-time OLAP engines need dedicated infrastructure or managed service fees. DuckDB has near-zero infrastructure cost. Tiger Data shares compute with OLTP workloads, so adding analytics costs less at the margin for teams already on PostgreSQL.

    Operational complexity and your team's capacity

    Self-hosted OLAP engines demand real operational investment. Running ClickHouse at scale means managing shard replication, partitioning, ZooKeeper or ClickHouse Keeper coordination, and merge policy tuning. Druid's architecture has five main node types: Broker, Historical, Coordinator, Overlord, and MiddleManager. Pinot brings its own complexity. These systems suit teams with dedicated infrastructure engineers.

    Managed services cut this burden significantly. Tiger Cloud (Tiger Data's managed service), ClickHouse Cloud, Snowflake, BigQuery, and MotherDuck all remove cluster management from your team's plate. Ask whether your team has the bandwidth to run a dedicated OLAP cluster at production quality, including 3am failure response. If the answer is no, managed services or PostgreSQL-native approaches lower operational risk without giving up query capability.

    OLAP database profiles: strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each

    The following profiles cover the most actively evaluated OLAP options in 2026. Prices are public list prices as of mid-2026. Verify them with each vendor before budgeting.

    ClickHouse for high-throughput append-only scan workloads

    ClickHouse leads most competitors on scan-aggregation queries over append-only datasets, as the ClickBench benchmark shows. It is open source (Apache 2.0), originally developed at Yandex, and now maintained by ClickHouse, Inc. You can self-host it and pay only for infrastructure. You can also use ClickHouse Cloud, which charges per compute unit-hour plus storage per TB-month.

    Best fit: immutable event logs, user behavior analytics, web and app telemetry, and ad-tech click streams. It suits any workload with append-only data and large aggregating scans over hundreds of millions to billions of rows.

    Strengths:

    • Exceptional column scan throughput on sequential reads.

    • Native Kafka integration for streaming ingest at millions of rows per second.

    • Multiple compression codecs (LZ4, ZSTD, LZ4HC), configurable per column.

    • Vector search, generally available since v25.8, for teams that combine analytics with embedding-based retrieval.

    Limitations:

    • JOINs need schema planning. They perform well when the right-hand table is small. Ad-hoc JOINs across normalized schemas with large right-side tables are slower and need tuning.

    • ClickHouse supports lightweight DELETE and, in beta, a standard UPDATE statement, alongside ReplacingMergeTree and mutations. None of these are built for frequent OLTP-style row updates. Workloads with frequent upserts are a poor fit.

    • Self-hosted clusters carry high operational complexity. ClickHouse Keeper, shard configuration, and merge tuning all need dedicated expertise.

    Apache Druid for sub-second event stream analytics

    Apache Druid is an open-source distributed OLAP system built for real-time event analytics. It began at Metamarkets and is now an Apache project, with a managed offering from Imply. It supports Druid SQL and native JSON queries. You can self-host it (a multi-node architecture with five node types, infrastructure cost only) or use Imply Cloud (contact for pricing).

    Best fit: sub-second queries over high-volume, append-only event streams, where data freshness matters more than query flexibility. Real-time operations dashboards, fraud detection, and ad-tech reporting fed continuously from Kafka are all strong matches.

    Strengths:

    • Proven production scale, documented at trillions of rows.

    • Native Kafka streaming ingestion with data available within seconds.

    • Pre-aggregation at ingest time, which reduces query load for known aggregation patterns.

    • Strong time-partitioned data management with automatic segment compaction.

    Limitations:

    • Druid has no row-level UPDATE or DELETE. It is append-only by design.

    • JOIN support is limited. Complex multi-table JOINs work best on fully denormalized schemas, which moves join complexity into the ingest pipeline.

    • The five-node architecture (Broker, Historical, Coordinator, Overlord, MiddleManager) needs dedicated operations expertise at production quality.

    • In new evaluations where JOINs matter, StarRocks now comes up more often.

    Apache Pinot for user-facing real-time dashboards at high concurrency

    Apache Pinot is an open-source distributed OLAP system developed at LinkedIn. It targets user-facing analytics products where thousands of end users query at the same time, and it powers LinkedIn's analytics features. It supports Pinot SQL and a REST API. You can self-host it or use StarTree Cloud (managed, contact for pricing).

    Best fit: User-facing dashboards with extreme concurrency (thousands to tens of thousands of simultaneous queries), latency under 100ms, and append-only or near-append-only data. Pinot is built for this pattern and can outperform general-purpose engines at that concurrency.

    Strengths:

    • Inverted indexes and star-tree indexes that keep responses under 100ms under high concurrency.

    • Deep Kafka integration, with data available in under a minute.

    • A mature production record for user-facing analytics at LinkedIn, Stripe, and Walmart.

    Limitations:

    • Pinot supports upserts on real-time tables, but it has no general row-level UPDATE or DELETE.

    • Self-hosted deployments carry high operational complexity. The architecture includes Controller, Broker, Server, and Minion nodes.

    • Pinot is less general-purpose than ClickHouse or StarRocks for exploratory queries and complex multi-table JOINs.

    • If your workload does not need extreme concurrency, you pay Pinot's operational cost without using its main strength.

    StarRocks for JOIN-heavy, CDC-updated real-time analytics

    StarRocks is an open-source MPP (massively parallel processing) OLAP database. It began as a fork of Apache Doris, a project that originated at Baidu, and launched as DorisDB. It is now an independent open-source project under the Linux Foundation, and CelerData provides a managed cloud offering. StarRocks uses MySQL-compatible SQL. You can self-host it (open source) or use CelerData Cloud (managed, contact for pricing).

    Best fit: real-time analytics that need both high-throughput ingest and complex JOINs. Strong matches include CDC-based ingestion from operational databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL), enrichment scenarios where fact tables join to frequently changing dimension tables, and multi-table analytics with concurrent updates.

    Strengths:

    • Native UPDATE and DELETE through Primary Key tables, which lets StarRocks handle CDC workloads without transformation in the pipeline.

    • Strong JOIN performance, especially when joining large fact tables to dimension tables.

    • MySQL-compatible SQL, which eases migration for teams coming from MySQL analytics setups.

    • Competitive benchmark results against ClickHouse on JOIN-heavy queries.

    Limitations:

    • The community is smaller than ClickHouse's or Druid's, with fewer native connectors and integrations.

    • CelerData Cloud pricing is not public, which complicates budgeting.

    • StarRocks is newer than Druid or ClickHouse, so operational tooling and edge-case documentation are thinner. First-time evaluators should plan longer POC cycles to surface operational edge cases.

    DuckDB and MotherDuck for embedded, local-first, or serverless analytics

    DuckDB is an in-process OLAP database that needs no server. It embeds in Python, R, Java, Go, and Node.js, or runs directly from a shell. MotherDuck is its managed cloud companion. It runs DuckDB in the cloud and adds collaboration, sharing, and a hybrid local-plus-cloud execution model. Both use standard SQL, and DuckDB's dialect closely follows PostgreSQL. DuckDB is free and open source (MIT license). 

    As of mid-2026, MotherDuck offers a free Lite tier (10 GB of storage and 10 compute hours per month, Pulse instances only) and a Business tier at $250 per organization per month plus usage. Storage beyond the free allocation costs $0.04 per GB-month. Pulse compute costs $0.60 per compute-unit hour, metered per query; larger instances are billed per second, up to $24.00 per hour for Giga, at US region rates. Verify current rates at motherduck.com before budgeting.

    Best fit: data science and analytics notebooks, local ETL transformations, serverless query layers over Parquet or Apache Iceberg files in object storage, and CLI-based data exploration. DuckDB 1.0 reached production stability in June 2024 and is now a popular choice for these patterns.

    Strengths:

    • Zero infrastructure overhead.

    • Native reading of Parquet, CSV, JSON, Apache Iceberg, and Delta Lake from local disk or object storage.

    • A PostgreSQL-like SQL dialect.

    • Exceptionally fast single-user analytical queries over file-based data.

    • A growing integration ecosystem (dbt, Evidence, Hex, Rill) that has accelerated adoption among data engineers.

    Limitations:

    • DuckDB runs as a single process and is not designed for concurrent multi-user serving.

    • MotherDuck extends DuckDB to the cloud but is built more for team analytics and per-user isolation than for thousands of concurrent dashboard queries. Avoid DuckDB as the query backend for a dashboard that 500 users will hit at once.

    • DuckDB is an analytical engine built for read-heavy work. It does not suit use as a primary production database for transactional writes.

    Snowflake, Google BigQuery, and Amazon Redshift for petabyte-scale batch BI

    These cloud-native data warehouses are the dominant choice for enterprise BI, regulatory reporting, and historical analytics at petabyte scale. All three separate query compute from storage, so you scale each independently. All three support standard SQL: BigQuery uses GoogleSQL, Redshift's dialect derives from PostgreSQL, and Snowflake uses its own ANSI-based dialect. All three are fully managed, with no infrastructure to run.

    Directional pricing (mid-2026):

    • Snowflake charges credits per compute-second plus storage per TB-month. Costs can climb quickly on high-concurrency or ad-hoc workloads.

    • BigQuery charges $6.25 per TiB scanned on demand (the first TiB each month is free), or offers capacity-based (Editions) slot pricing for predictable compute cost. Storage costs about $0.02 per GiB-month for active logical storage, varying by region.

    • Redshift uses instance-based pricing (RA3 nodes) or Redshift Serverless, billed per RPU-hour.

    Verify current pricing on each vendor's pricing page before budgeting.

    Best fit: historical BI reporting, regulatory and compliance data stores, multi-petabyte analytics where seconds-to-minutes query latency is acceptable, and integration with BI tools (Tableau, Looker, Power BI). If your main need is last month's sales report or quarterly compliance exports, this is the right category.

    Strengths:

    • Fully managed operation with no cluster overhead.

    • A mature, deep BI tool ecosystem.

    • Strong SQL completeness, including UPDATE and DELETE.

    • Growing support for ML inference inside the database.

    • Native Iceberg table support in Snowflake, which reduces lock-in by keeping data in an open format.

    Limitations:

    • Standard ingest brings freshness latency of minutes to hours. Real-time options exist (Snowpipe Streaming, BigQuery Storage Write API), but they add cost and architectural complexity.

    • Snowflake costs can climb sharply for ad-hoc, exploratory workloads with unpredictable scope.

    • BigQuery's on-demand model is cost-efficient for predictable query patterns but can surprise teams that run broad exploratory scans.

    • If you need data fresher than 60 seconds, standard ingest on Snowflake and Redshift will not deliver it.

    PostgreSQL with Tiger Data’s TimescaleDB for PostgreSQL teams needing real-time analytics without a second system

    Tiger Cloud is a managed PostgreSQL database that extends PostgreSQL with Hypercore (a hybrid row-columnar storage engine), hypertables (time-partitioned tables with automatic partition management), and continuous aggregates (incrementally refreshed materialized views). 

    TimescaleDB, Tiger Data's PostgreSQL extension, powers these capabilities. Tiger Cloud uses usage-based pricing with independent compute and storage scaling, and an Enterprise plan adds an enterprise uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, and production support. See tigerdata.com/pricing for current rates. 

    Best fit: teams already on PostgreSQL that need real-time analytical performance without a separate OLAP system. Strong fits include time-series workloads (IoT, operational telemetry, energy monitoring, infrastructure metrics), HTAP workloads where analytics must reflect live transactional state, and scenarios that need full SQL and UPDATE/DELETE alongside analytical queries.

    Strengths:

    • Compression. Hypercore converts older data chunks to columnar format automatically as data ages. It delivers up to 98% compression for time-series data in documented benchmarks. Latitude reports saving about $12,000 a month in storage costs, crediting compression and continuous aggregates. Flogistix by Flowco reports 66% savings on infrastructure and storage costs. 

    • Continuous aggregates. They provide HOLAP-style pre-aggregation that refreshes incrementally on a schedule. Dashboards query the pre-computed aggregate, so they stay fast without a batch ETL job, and real-time aggregation can add rows that arrived since the last refresh.

    • Hypertables. They manage time-based partitioning automatically. Chunk exclusion lets queries skip chunks outside the time filter, which keeps latency stable as data grows.

    • One system. Full PostgreSQL compatibility means no pipeline between the OLTP and OLAP layers. A split architecture (Postgres for writes, ClickHouse for reads, Kafka in the middle) brings pipeline failures, backfill complexity, and drift between the operational database and the analytics layer. Tiger Data eliminates that fragmentation.

    • Vector search. pgvector and pgvectorscale work alongside analytical queries. Teams that combine time-series or event analytics with embedding-based retrieval can use one database.

    Limitations:

    • TimescaleDB is not designed for pure-analytical workloads that have fully outgrown PostgreSQL. At multi-petabyte scale with no transactional component (historical reporting only, no real-time needs), Snowflake or BigQuery are more cost-effective. TimescaleDB's strengths lie in HTAP and operational analytics. It does not aim to replace a petabyte-scale enterprise data warehouse.

    • For sub-100ms dashboard queries at 1,000 or more simultaneous users, ClickHouse and Apache Pinot are purpose-built. Tiger Data handles moderate analytical concurrency well. Extreme user-facing concurrency is where dedicated engines have the advantage.

    • For embedded or local-first analytics (data science notebooks, CLI exploration, serverless queries over Parquet files), DuckDB is simpler. Tiger Cloud runs as a managed database server.

    For a deeper look, see PostgreSQL as a real-time analytics database and Continuous aggregates as incremental materialized views for time-series data.

    Decision framework for selecting an OLAP architecture

    Use these criteria as a starting filter. Then validate your shortlist against your actual query patterns in a POC. Within each category, the named engines give you more specific options.

    Choose a cloud data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift) when:

    • Your main workload is historical reporting and BI, and data that is minutes to hours old is acceptable.

    • You work at petabyte scale, and your team cannot sustain a dedicated infrastructure operations function.

    • BI tool integration (Tableau, Looker, Power BI) is a primary requirement.

    • Your query volume is significant and predictable. Watch Snowflake costs on ad-hoc and exploratory workloads.

    Choose a real-time OLAP engine (ClickHouse, StarRocks, Druid, Pinot) when:

    • You need sub-second query latency on data that is seconds to minutes old.

    • Your data is mostly append-only event streams. If you also need JOINs, prefer StarRocks over Druid. For extreme concurrency (thousands of simultaneous users), prefer Pinot.

    • You need to serve real-time dashboards to 100 or more concurrent users.

    • Your team can run and tune a dedicated OLAP cluster, or you can adopt a managed offering (ClickHouse Cloud, CelerData).

    • Your data volume runs from terabytes to petabytes, and you need sub-second scan performance across it.

    Choose DuckDB or MotherDuck when:

    • You want local analytics, data science notebooks, or CLI-based data exploration.

    • You need a query layer over Parquet or Apache Iceberg files in object storage, with no running server.

    • Concurrency is low (a single user or a small team), and infrastructure overhead is unacceptable.

    • You are building a serverless analytics pipeline and want near-zero infrastructure cost.

    Choose PostgreSQL with Tiger Data when:

    • You already use PostgreSQL and want to add real-time analytics without operating a second system.

    • Your workload mixes transactional operations with analytical queries (HTAP).

    • You have time-series data (IoT, monitoring, telemetry, energy) with strong time-ordering characteristics.

    • You need real-time analytics for a moderate number of concurrent users

    • You need full SQL and UPDATE/DELETE alongside analytical queries.

    • Operational simplicity matters to you. That means one database for both workloads, no ETL pipeline to manage, and no new query language to learn.

    • You want to combine analytical queries with vector search through pgvector or pgvectorscale.

    Choose a lakehouse query engine (Trino, Databricks SQL) when:

    • You have a large existing data lake in object storage and want a federated query layer without migrating the data.

    • You need interoperability across multiple systems and formats (Hive, Iceberg, Delta Lake, Hudi).

    • Your engineering team can operate distributed compute infrastructure at production quality.

    • You must avoid single-vendor lock-in on both the query engine and the data format.

    For teams choosing between a dedicated real-time OLAP engine and a PostgreSQL-native approach, see How to choose a real-time analytics database for a more detailed comparison.

    How to run a POC before committing

    A well-structured proof of concept catches architecture mismatches before they turn into production incidents. Work through this checklist before you make a final decision.

    • Use your own data. ClickBench (maintained by ClickHouse) and TPC-H give useful directional comparisons. They cannot predict performance on your schema, value distributions, and access patterns. From the start, run your actual query patterns against a representative sample of your real data.

    • Benchmark p99 latency. Median latency looks good on almost every database. The 99th percentile shows how a system behaves under load, when hot partitions, memory pressure, and concurrent ingest all compete at once. Your users feel that latency at peak.

    • Test at your expected concurrency. Most OLAP engines look fast with one query in flight. Check what happens at 50, 100, or 500 simultaneous queries. Run an explicit concurrent load test rather than sequential benchmarks.

    • Measure ingest throughput under concurrent query load. Many databases slow down significantly when ingestion and queries compete for the same CPU and memory. Simulate both at the same time.

    • Check compression ratio on your actual data. Published compression ratios are best-case results, usually on regular, low-cardinality numeric time-series. Irregular JSON payloads, text fields, and high-cardinality columns compress less. Run the real ingest, then compare on-disk size to raw input size.

    • Test JOINs if your queries use them. If your analytical queries JOIN across multiple tables, test that exact pattern at representative data volumes. A database that performs well on single-table scans may slow down sharply under multi-table JOINs.

    • Evaluate the operational runbook. Simulate a node failure before you deploy to production. Find out who restarts the cluster at 3am, how long recovery takes, and what data is at risk. Understand these failure modes before the system handles production traffic.

    • Model cost under your actual query pattern. Estimates built on simple examples often understate real cost at high query volume, especially on cloud data warehouses. Run a week of representative queries and measure compute consumption. Then project annual cost from that baseline. Vendor calculators with round numbers tend to miss the real figure.

    Start with your workload, not the vendor list

    The most common OLAP selection mistake is starting with a database name instead of a workload requirement. No single database wins on all five decision criteria, so this guide groups the options into five architecture categories. A system built for sub-100ms latency at very high concurrency (Pinot) makes different trade-offs than one built for HTAP on PostgreSQL with no separate ETL pipeline (Tiger Data). Both differ again from a petabyte-scale managed warehouse (Snowflake).

    Work through the five decision criteria and identify your architecture category. Then run the POC checklist against your actual data and query patterns. You will have a defensible answer before you commit to infrastructure.

    If you already use PostgreSQL and want to see how Tiger Data's analytical capabilities handle your workload, start with the Tiger Cloud free trial. You can also explore the TimescaleDB open-source extension and run it yourself.

    Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

    What is the difference between MOLAP, ROLAP, and HOLAP?

    MOLAP (Multidimensional OLAP) pre-aggregates data into multidimensional cubes before queries run. Known queries are fast, but ad-hoc queries are inflexible. ROLAP (Relational OLAP) runs queries against relational or columnar storage at query time, with no pre-aggregation requirement. This gives full flexibility for ad-hoc analysis. ClickHouse, StarRocks, Snowflake, BigQuery, and Redshift fit here. Druid and Pinot are often listed in this group too, though both can pre-aggregate data at ingestion. HOLAP (Hybrid OLAP) combines pre-aggregation for known patterns with live querying for ad-hoc ones. Tiger Data's continuous aggregates offer similar behavior on PostgreSQL through incremental refresh. In 2026, MOLAP is a legacy architecture for most new projects. Hybrid approaches, including continuous aggregates on PostgreSQL, are gaining ground.

    What is the difference between OLAP and OLTP?

    OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) systems are built for high-throughput writes and narrow point lookups. Typical operations include inserting orders, updating inventory, and fetching single user records. OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) systems are built for wide aggregations across large datasets. Typical operations include computing aggregates, joining fact and dimension tables, and scanning billions of rows. Schema design follows the same split. OLTP uses normalized schemas for write efficiency and referential integrity. OLAP often uses star schemas, which keep JOINs to a minimum at query time. Many modern engines also favor wide, denormalized tables. The boundary is blurring in 2026, as HTAP architectures can deliver analytical performance directly on operational PostgreSQL data.

    When should I choose a dedicated OLAP database vs. an extended relational database?

    Choose a dedicated OLAP engine (ClickHouse, StarRocks, Druid, Pinot) if your workload is mostly append-only event streams, if you need sub-100ms p99 latency at 100 or more concurrent users, or if your data volume has reached the petabyte range with no transactional requirement. Choose an extended relational database like Tiger Data if you already use PostgreSQL, if your workload mixes transactional operations with analytical queries, or if you want to avoid the engineering overhead of a split architecture. That architecture uses Postgres for writes, a separate OLAP system for reads, and pipelines in the middle. The split architecture pays off at extreme scale and concurrency. Below that level, its operational cost often outweighs the performance gain.

    When is it worth investing in separate OLAP infrastructure?

    Separate OLAP infrastructure makes sense when your analytical workload has clearly separated from your transactional workload in access patterns and scale. It also makes sense when you need sub-100ms latency at 100 or more concurrent users, or when your data volume exceeds what a PostgreSQL-native system handles cost-effectively at multi-petabyte scale. Separate infrastructure carries a hidden cost, which is the pipeline. It includes Kafka connectors, CDC configuration, backfill management, schema synchronization, and on-call work when the pipeline fails. Teams often underestimate this platform tax. Run the POC checklist to see whether a PostgreSQL-native approach meets your requirements before you commit to a dual-system architecture.

    Which OLAP databases have the best data compression?

    Tiger Data's Hypercore columnstore achieves up to 98% compression for time-series data in documented benchmarks. That makes it a strong option for IoT, telemetry, and other sequential, time-ordered data with low-cardinality numeric values. ClickHouse compresses append-only event data well using LZ4 and ZSTD codecs, and you can choose the codec per column. StarRocks and Druid also use columnar compression. Cloud data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery) handle compression transparently, so you pay for storage and cannot tune compression directly. Actual ratios on your data will differ from benchmarks, depending on value cardinality and data types.

    Which OLAP databases are best for real-time or IoT analytics?

    Tiger Data is purpose-built for time-series IoT workloads. Hypertables partition data by time automatically, Hypercore compresses sequential sensor data heavily, and continuous aggregates keep dashboards fast without batch ETL. ClickHouse is strong for high-throughput IoT ingest at scale, if your workload is append-only and your team can manage the operational complexity. Apache Druid and Pinot are strong for real-time event stream analytics. Druid has no row-level UPDATE or DELETE, and Pinot supports upserts on real-time tables with some constraints. IoT patterns that rely on updates, such as device state corrections and late-arriving data, therefore need extra pipeline work on these engines. If you need mutable data and full SQL alongside real-time analytics, Tiger Data's PostgreSQL foundation is a practical fit.

    Which OLAP databases require the least operational overhead?

    DuckDB needs near-zero operational effort. It runs as an in-process library with no server, no cluster, and no infrastructure to manage. Tiger Cloud (Tiger Data's managed service) and ClickHouse Cloud both handle cluster management, so your team mainly focuses on query tuning and schema design. Snowflake and BigQuery are the lowest-overhead options at enterprise scale. Both are fully managed and scale automatically, with few infrastructure decisions left to you. Self-hosted ClickHouse, Druid, and Pinot demand the most operational investment. Your team needs expertise in cluster management, partition policies, and replication.

    Can PostgreSQL handle OLAP workloads at scale?

    Vanilla PostgreSQL (without extensions) reaches its analytical limits when queries shift from point lookups to large scans and aggregations over tens or hundreds of millions of rows. With the TimescaleDB extension, which powers Tiger Data, PostgreSQL handles OLAP workloads effectively at terabyte scale. Hypercore converts data to columnar format for analytical scans. Hypertables partition data by time, which keeps queries bounded. Continuous aggregates pre-compute common aggregations. Flogistix by Flowco, for example, reports 84% compression in production on its hypertables and continuous aggregates. PostgreSQL with the right extensions competes well with dedicated OLAP engines for the workload profile it targets. It is not designed to replace a purpose-built engine for purely analytical workloads at multi-petabyte scale.

    What is the strongest OLAP database for a small team with limited engineering capacity?

    For local analytics and notebook-based exploration, DuckDB is the best fit. It needs zero infrastructure, adds no operational burden, and gives immediate results. For production analytics at moderate concurrency, Tiger Cloud and ClickHouse Cloud are managed services that take cluster operations off your team's plate. Tiger Cloud has an added advantage for teams already on PostgreSQL. They learn no new query language and face minimal migration effort. For a small team without dedicated infrastructure engineers, self-hosted ClickHouse, Druid, or Pinot are high-risk choices. Their operational complexity is real, and their failure modes take expertise to handle.

    How do I evaluate OLAP databases before committing?

    Follow the POC checklist above. Run your actual query patterns against a representative sample of your real data, and skip vendor benchmarks. Benchmark p99 latency instead of p50. Test at your expected concurrency (50, 100, or 500 simultaneous users) with more than single-user queries. Run ingest and queries at the same time. Measure on-disk compression on your own data, and ignore quoted best-case ratios. Test JOIN-heavy queries if your application needs them. Simulate a node failure before production deployment. Finally, project annual cost from a week of representative query volume rather than from a vendor calculator.

    What is an HTAP database, and is it an alternative to a dedicated OLAP engine?

    HTAP (Hybrid Transactional/Analytical Processing) databases handle transactional writes and analytical reads in a single system. This often removes the need for a separate ETL pipeline between an operational database and an analytics engine. Tiger Data is an HTAP system. It handles transactional inserts, updates, and deletes with full ACID guarantees, and it serves analytical queries through Hypercore's columnar storage. HTAP is a genuine alternative to a dedicated OLAP engine when you need data freshness, transactional correctness, and full SQL alongside analytical performance. If your workload has fully separated from any transactional requirement, such as historical batch BI at petabyte scale, a dedicated OLAP engine or cloud data warehouse remains the stronger choice.

    Which OLAP databases are open source?

    ClickHouse is open source under the Apache 2.0 license, and ClickHouse Cloud is the managed offering. Apache Druid and Apache Pinot are Apache Software Foundation projects under the Apache 2.0 license. StarRocks is open source under the Apache 2.0 license, and CelerData provides a managed service. DuckDB is open source under the MIT license, and MotherDuck is the managed companion. TimescaleDB powers Tiger Cloud. Its core is open source under Apache 2.0, while some advanced features, such as columnar compression, fall under the source-available Timescale License. Tiger Cloud is the managed service, and tigerdata.com has current licensing details. Snowflake, BigQuery, and Amazon Redshift are proprietary managed services with no open-source option.